[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55c9e2ae-b060-baa2-460c-90eb3e9ded5c@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:45:28 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Joerg Reuter <jreuter@...na.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-hams@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH NET 1/7] skbuff: introduce pskb_realloc_headroom()
On 7/12/21 8:53 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> I saw you asked about naming in a different sub-thread, what do you
> mean by "'pskb_expand_head' have different semantic"? AFAIU the 'p'
> in pskb stands for "private", meaning not shared. In fact
> skb_realloc_headroom() should really be pskb... but it predates the
> 'pskb' naming pattern by quite a while. Long story short
> skb_expand_head() seems like a good name. With the current patch
> pskb_realloc_headroom() vs skb_realloc_headroom() would give people
> exactly the opposite intuition of what the code does.
Thank you for feedback,
I'll change helper name back to skb_expand_head() in next patch version.
Vasily Averin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists