[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YOy0HAnhsXJ4W210@google.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 21:29:00 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+a3fcd59df1b372066f5a@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mark.rutland@....com, masahiroy@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
sedat.dilek@...il.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
vitor@...saru.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
will@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in try_grab_compound_head
On Thu, Jul 08, 2021, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 03 2021 at 13:24, syzbot wrote:
> > syzbot has bisected this issue to:
> >
> > commit 997acaf6b4b59c6a9c259740312a69ea549cc684
> > Author: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Date: Mon Jan 11 15:37:07 2021 +0000
> >
> > lockdep: report broken irq restoration
>
> That's the commit which makes the underlying problem visible:
>
> raw_local_irq_restore() called with IRQs enabled
>
> and is triggered by this call chain:
>
> kvm_wait arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:860 [inline]
> kvm_wait+0xc3/0xe0 arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:837
And the bug in kvm_wait() was fixed by commit f4e61f0c9add ("x86/kvm: Fix broken
irq restoration in kvm_wait"). The bisection is bad, syzbot happened into the
kvm_wait() WARN and got distracted. The original #GP looks stable, if someone
from mm land has bandwidth.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists