linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 351/593] cw1200: Revert unnecessary patches that fix unreal use-after-free bugs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210712060924.825852059@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Jul 2021 08:08:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hang Zhang <zh.nvgt@...il.com>,
        Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 351/593] cw1200: Revert unnecessary patches that fix unreal use-after-free bugs

From: Hang Zhang <zh.nvgt@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 3f60f4685699aa6006e58e424637e8e413e0a94d ]

A previous commit 4f68ef64cd7f ("cw1200: Fix concurrency
use-after-free bugs in cw1200_hw_scan()") tried to fix a seemingly
use-after-free bug between cw1200_bss_info_changed() and
cw1200_hw_scan(), where the former frees a sk_buff pointed
to by frame.skb, and the latter accesses the sk_buff
pointed to by frame.skb. However, this issue should be a
false alarm because:

(1) "frame.skb" is not a shared variable between the above
two functions, because "frame" is a local function variable,
each of the two functions has its own local "frame" - they
just happen to have the same variable name.

(2) the sk_buff(s) pointed to by these two "frame.skb" are
also two different object instances, they are individually
allocated by different dev_alloc_skb() within the two above
functions. To free one object instance will not invalidate
the access of another different one.

Based on these facts, the previous commit should be unnecessary.
Moreover, it also introduced a missing unlock which was
addressed in a subsequent commit 51c8d24101c7 ("cw1200: fix missing
unlock on error in cw1200_hw_scan()"). Now that the
original use-after-free is unreal, these two commits should
be reverted. This patch performs the reversion.

Fixes: 4f68ef64cd7f ("cw1200: Fix concurrency use-after-free bugs in cw1200_hw_scan()")
Fixes: 51c8d24101c7 ("cw1200: fix missing unlock on error in cw1200_hw_scan()")
Signed-off-by: Hang Zhang <zh.nvgt@...il.com>
Acked-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210521223238.25020-1-zh.nvgt@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c | 17 +++++++----------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c
index 988581cc134b..1f856fbbc0ea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/st/cw1200/scan.c
@@ -75,30 +75,27 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	if (req->n_ssids > WSM_SCAN_MAX_NUM_OF_SSIDS)
 		return -EINVAL;

-	/* will be unlocked in cw1200_scan_work() */
-	down(&priv->scan.lock);
-	mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex);
-
 	frame.skb = ieee80211_probereq_get(hw, priv->vif->addr, NULL, 0,
 		req->ie_len);
-	if (!frame.skb) {
-		mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
-		up(&priv->scan.lock);
+	if (!frame.skb)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	}

 	if (req->ie_len)
 		skb_put_data(frame.skb, req->ie, req->ie_len);

+	/* will be unlocked in cw1200_scan_work() */
+	down(&priv->scan.lock);
+	mutex_lock(&priv->conf_mutex);
+
 	ret = wsm_set_template_frame(priv, &frame);
 	if (!ret) {
 		/* Host want to be the probe responder. */
 		ret = wsm_set_probe_responder(priv, true);
 	}
 	if (ret) {
-		dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
 		mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
 		up(&priv->scan.lock);
+		dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
 		return ret;
 	}

@@ -120,8 +117,8 @@ int cw1200_hw_scan(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 		++priv->scan.n_ssids;
 	}

-	dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
 	mutex_unlock(&priv->conf_mutex);
+	dev_kfree_skb(frame.skb);
 	queue_work(priv->workqueue, &priv->scan.work);
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.2