linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH dhowells-fs] cachefiles: fscache_lru_cookie

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:32:03 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH dhowells-fs] cachefiles: fscache_lru_cookie_timeout can
 be static

fs/fscache/cookie.c:34:14: warning: symbol 'fscache_lru_cookie_timeout' was not declared. Should it be static?

Fixes: 4bd5274decc6 ("cachefiles: Automatically close a file that's not in use after a while")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
 cookie.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fscache/cookie.c b/fs/fscache/cookie.c
index c6c3ce8be80d7..618b040e156b2 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/cookie.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/cookie.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fscache_cookie_lru_lock);
 static DEFINE_TIMER(fscache_cookie_lru_timer, fscache_cookie_lru_timed_out);
 static DECLARE_WORK(fscache_cookie_lru_work, fscache_cookie_lru_worker);
 static const char fscache_cookie_stages[FSCACHE_COOKIE_STAGE__NR] = "-LCAIFMWRD";
-unsigned int fscache_lru_cookie_timeout = 10 * HZ;
+static unsigned int fscache_lru_cookie_timeout = 10 * HZ;
 
 void fscache_print_cookie(struct fscache_cookie *cookie, char prefix)
 {