| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpGB96oDToQewi6x2AAc03S1v0A97Z4OyiyZG9hCJ6nSOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 18:12:22 -0700
From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, apopple@...dia.com,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [External] [PATCH v3 2/3] mm, memcg: inline mem_cgroup_{charge/uncharge}
to improve disabled memcg config
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 4:08 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 8:36 AM Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Inline mem_cgroup_{charge/uncharge} and mem_cgroup_uncharge_list functions
> > functions to perform mem_cgroup_disabled static key check inline before
> > calling the main body of the function. This minimizes the memcg overhead
> > in the pagefault and exit_mmap paths when memcgs are disabled using
> > cgroup_disable=memory command-line option.
> > This change results in ~0.4% overhead reduction when running PFT test
> > comparing {CONFIG_MEMCG=n} against {CONFIG_MEMCG=y, cgroup_disable=memory}
> > configurationon on an 8-core ARM64 Android device.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> But some nits below.
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
> > 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > index bfe5c486f4ad..39fa88051a42 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> > @@ -693,13 +693,35 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_below_min(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> > page_counter_read(&memcg->memory);
> > }
> >
> > -int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > +int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > +static inline int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +{
> > + if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > + return 0;
> > + return __mem_cgroup_charge(page, mm, gfp_mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > int mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_page(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > gfp_t gfp, swp_entry_t entry);
> > void mem_cgroup_swapin_uncharge_swap(swp_entry_t entry);
> >
> > -void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page);
> > -void mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list);
> > +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page);
> > +static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > + return;
> > + __mem_cgroup_uncharge(page);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list);
> > +static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> > +{
> > + if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > + return;
> > + __mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(page_list);
> > +}
> >
> > void mem_cgroup_migrate(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage);
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > index a228cd51c4bd..cdaf7003b43d 100644
> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -6701,8 +6701,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
> > atomic_long_read(&parent->memory.children_low_usage)));
> > }
> >
> > -static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > - gfp_t gfp)
> > +static int charge_memcg(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp)
> > {
> > unsigned int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
> > int ret;
> > @@ -6723,7 +6722,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * mem_cgroup_charge - charge a newly allocated page to a cgroup
> > + * __mem_cgroup_charge - charge a newly allocated page to a cgroup
> > * @page: page to charge
> > * @mm: mm context of the victim
> > * @gfp_mask: reclaim mode
> > @@ -6736,16 +6735,14 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > *
> > * Returns 0 on success. Otherwise, an error code is returned.
> > */
> > -int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > +int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > {
> > struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
> > - ret = __mem_cgroup_charge(page, memcg, gfp_mask);
> > + ret = charge_memcg(page, memcg, gfp_mask);
> > css_put(&memcg->css);
> >
> > return ret;
> > @@ -6780,7 +6777,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_swapin_charge_page(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> > memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > - ret = __mem_cgroup_charge(page, memcg, gfp);
> > + ret = charge_memcg(page, memcg, gfp);
> >
> > css_put(&memcg->css);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -6916,18 +6913,15 @@ static void uncharge_page(struct page *page, struct uncharge_gather *ug)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * mem_cgroup_uncharge - uncharge a page
> > + * __mem_cgroup_uncharge - uncharge a page
> > * @page: page to uncharge
> > *
> > * Uncharge a page previously charged with mem_cgroup_charge().
>
> The comment here also needs to be updated.
>
> mem_cgroup_uncharge() -> __mem_cgroup_uncharge()
>
> > */
> > -void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page)
> > +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page)
> > {
> > struct uncharge_gather ug;
> >
> > - if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > - return;
> > -
> > /* Don't touch page->lru of any random page, pre-check: */
> > if (!page_memcg(page))
> > return;
> > @@ -6938,20 +6932,17 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge(struct page *page)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > - * mem_cgroup_uncharge_list - uncharge a list of page
> > + * __mem_cgroup_uncharge_list - uncharge a list of page
> > * @page_list: list of pages to uncharge
> > *
> > * Uncharge a list of pages previously charged with
> > * mem_cgroup_charge().
>
> Should be __mem_cgroup_charge().
Fixed and posted in v4 at:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=507943
Thanks!
>
> Thanks.
>
> > */
> > -void mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> > +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(struct list_head *page_list)
> > {
> > struct uncharge_gather ug;
> > struct page *page;
> >
> > - if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> > - return;
> > -
> > uncharge_gather_clear(&ug);
> > list_for_each_entry(page, page_list, lru)
> > uncharge_page(page, &ug);
> > --
> > 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists