linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] use 64bit timer for hpet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C8CF5E7F-58D9-4FD7-B138-50C66620BE33@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:43:09 +0800
From:   Linux <zhaoyan.liao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        songmuchun@...edance.com, likunkun@...edance.com,
        guancheng.rjk@...baba-inc.com, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
        wenan.mao@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use 64bit timer for hpet

OK, Thank you for your patience. the last question:
> I forgot the details, but when I tried moving HPET to 64bit it did not
> work on one of my machines due to an erratum and other people reported
> similar issues on different CPUs/chipsets.
> 
> TBH, I'm not interested at all to chase down these buggy implementations
> and have yet another pile of quirks.

Can you tell me the erranum or issue link at that time? This is very important
 to us.

Thank you very much.


> 2021年7月12日 下午3:25，Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> 写道：
> 
> Liao,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 12 2021 at 12:52, Linux wrote:
>>> Sorry, keeping the softirq from running for 3 minutes is simply out of
>>> spec. If the sysadmin decides to do so, then he can keep the pieces.
>> 
>> It is because the kernel thread is busy that the clocksource_watchdog 
>> thread is not scheduled, not softirq.
> 
> Which thread?
> 
> The clocksource watchdog runs from a timer_list timer callback in
> softirq context. Even if the softirq is switched to the softirq thread
> then still my argument of starving that for 3 minutes still stands.
> 
> This is _not_ a kernel problem. Overcommitment is a admin problem.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>        tglx