[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YO12ARa3i1TprGnJ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 14:16:17 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jic23@...nel.org,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] kernel.h: Split out container_of() and
typeof_memeber() macros
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:37:46PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:45:41AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > kernel.h is being used as a dump for all kinds of stuff for a long time.
> > Here is the attempt cleaning it up by splitting out container_of() and
> > typeof_memeber() macros.
>
> That feels messy, why?
Because the headers in the kernel are messy.
> Reading one .h file for these common
> macros/defines is fine, why are container_of and typeof somehow
> deserving of their own .h files?
It's explained here. There are tons of drivers that includes kernel.h for only
a few or even solely for container_of() macro.
> What speedups are you seeing by
> splitting this up?
C preprocessing.
> > At the same time convert users in the header and other folders to use it.
> > Though for time being include new header back to kernel.h to avoid twisted
> > indirected includes for existing users.
> >
> > Note, there are _a lot_ of headers and modules that include kernel.h solely
> > for one of these macros and this allows to unburden compiler for the twisted
> > inclusion paths and to make new code cleaner in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/kunit/test.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > include/linux/container_of.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 31 +-----------------------------
> > include/linux/kobject.h | 14 +++++++-------
>
> Why are all of these changes needed to kobject.h for this one change?
> This diff:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/kobject.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kobject.h
> > @@ -15,18 +15,18 @@
> > #ifndef _KOBJECT_H_
> > #define _KOBJECT_H_
> >
> > -#include <linux/types.h>
> > -#include <linux/list.h>
> > -#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> > #include <linux/compiler.h>
> > -#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> > #include <linux/kref.h>
> > #include <linux/kobject_ns.h>
> > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/wait.h>
> > -#include <linux/atomic.h>
> > -#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/uidgid.h>
> > +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> Is a lot more changes than the "split the macros out" deserves.
>
> Please make this a separate change, remember to only do one thing at a
> time (this patch is at least 2 changes...)
>
> so NAK, this change isn't ok as-is.
Fair enough. I will remove these conversions from the patch in v2.
Thanks for review!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists