lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:33:24 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, james.morse@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cacheinfo: clear cache_leaves(cpu) in
 free_cache_attributes()

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 11:47:38AM +0800, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
> On ARM64, when PPTT(Processor Properties Topology Table) is not
> implemented in ACPI boot, we will goto 'free_ci' with the following
> print:
>   Unable to detect cache hierarchy for CPU 0
>

The change itself looks good and I am fine with that. However,...

> But some other codes may still use 'num_leaves' to iterate through the

Can you point me exactly where it is used to make sure there are no
other issues associated with that.

> 'info_list', such as get_cpu_cacheinfo_id(). If 'info_list' is NULL , it
> would crash. So clear 'num_leaves' in free_cache_attributes().
>

And can you provide the crash dump please ? If we are not hitting any
issue and you just figured this with code inspection, that is fine. It
helps to determine if this needs to be backport or just good to have
clean up.

> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/cacheinfo.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> index bfc0959..dad2962 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ static void free_cache_attributes(unsigned int cpu)
>
>  	kfree(per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu));
>  	per_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu) = NULL;
> +	cache_leaves(cpu) = 0;

I initially thought it might get used and crash in cache_shared_cpu_map_remove
but you are setting it later. So where do you suspect it to be used ? Sorry
if I am missing something obvious, looking at this code after long time.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ