linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 101/108] scsi: libfc: Fix array index out of bound exception

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210714193800.52097-101-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:37:53 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Javed Hasan <jhasan@...vell.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 101/108] scsi: libfc: Fix array index out of bound exception

From: Javed Hasan <jhasan@...vell.com>

[ Upstream commit b27c4577557045f1ab3cdfeabfc7f3cd24aca1fe ]

Fix array index out of bound exception in fc_rport_prli_resp().

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210615165939.24327-1-jhasan@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Javed Hasan <jhasan@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
index cd0fb8ca2425..33da3c1085f0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
@@ -1162,6 +1162,7 @@ static void fc_rport_prli_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
 		resp_code = (pp->spp.spp_flags & FC_SPP_RESP_MASK);
 		FC_RPORT_DBG(rdata, "PRLI spp_flags = 0x%x spp_type 0x%x\n",
 			     pp->spp.spp_flags, pp->spp.spp_type);
+
 		rdata->spp_type = pp->spp.spp_type;
 		if (resp_code != FC_SPP_RESP_ACK) {
 			if (resp_code == FC_SPP_RESP_CONF)
@@ -1184,11 +1185,13 @@ static void fc_rport_prli_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
 		/*
 		 * Call prli provider if we should act as a target
 		 */
-		prov = fc_passive_prov[rdata->spp_type];
-		if (prov) {
-			memset(&temp_spp, 0, sizeof(temp_spp));
-			prov->prli(rdata, pp->prli.prli_spp_len,
-				   &pp->spp, &temp_spp);
+		if (rdata->spp_type < FC_FC4_PROV_SIZE) {
+			prov = fc_passive_prov[rdata->spp_type];
+			if (prov) {
+				memset(&temp_spp, 0, sizeof(temp_spp));
+				prov->prli(rdata, pp->prli.prli_spp_len,
+					   &pp->spp, &temp_spp);
+			}
 		}
 		/*
 		 * Check if the image pair could be established
-- 
2.30.2