[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210714203550.zlbvfh6rfnah6iir@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 22:35:50 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 024/108] ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: Fix gpio
function name for pads GPIO_[A-F]
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:36:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>
> [ Upstream commit e0cdd26af8eb9001689a4cde4f72c61c1c4b06be ]
>
> The pinfunc definitions used GPIO_A as function instead of GPIO_1_0 as
> done for all the other pins with GPIO functionality. Fix for consistency.
>
> There are no mainline users that needs adaption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
I'm not convinced it's a good idea to take this patch for stable.
in-tree users are unaffected and the only effect this can have on
out-of-tree users is to break them. So the gain of having this is not
positive.
Am I missing something?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists