linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add SM6115, SM4250 APCS compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1bfa7490-2d00-15b0-0096-0fd9a27a491e@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 23:48:24 +0300
From:   Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        Sivaprakash Murugesan <sivaprak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add SM6115, SM4250
 APCS compatible

On 7/14/21 9:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:37:58 +0300, Iskren Chernev wrote:
>> Add compatible for the Qualcomm SM6115 and SM4250 APCS block to the
>> Qualcomm APCS binding.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml      | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 

As was discussed in the pinctrl series [1], the two compatibles are actually
different bins of the same SoC (codename bengal), so there would be only one
SoC dtsi, so I made v2 of all of my series, the v2 for this one is here [2]


Let me know what the right thing to do is (keep just sm6115 or have both around).


[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/25/918
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/27/167