lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:01:40 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] dt-bindings: power: supply: smb347-charger:
 Document USB VBUS regulator

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 03:22:40AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 12.07.2021 18:39, Rob Herring пишет:
> >> +  summit,inok-polarity:
> >> +    description: |
> >> +      Polarity of INOK signal indicating presence of external power supply.
> >> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> >> +    enum:
> >> +      - 0 # SMB3XX_SYSOK_INOK_ACTIVE_LOW
> >> +      - 1 # SMB3XX_SYSOK_INOK_ACTIVE_HIGH
> >> +
> >> +  usb-vbus:
> >> +    $ref: "../../regulator/regulator.yaml#"
> >> +    type: object
> >        unevaluatedProperties: false
> > 
> > With that,
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > 
> 
> I tried to add the unevaluatedProperties + a random unrelated property
> to the example usb-vbus node and dt_binding_check is happy with that. So
> the unevaluatedProperties has no effect, is it supposed to be so?

Yes, until support lands upstream[1].

Rob

[1] https://github.com/Julian/jsonschema/pull/817

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ