[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efae56878575297039d745c61503b96321d31e52.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:17:04 +0200
From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
festevam@...il.com, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com,
frieder.schrempf@...tron.de, m.felsch@...gutronix.de,
xiaoning.wang@....com
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com,
kernel@...gutronix.de, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 05/12] dmaengine: dma: imx-sdma: add fw_loaded and
is_ram_script
Am Mittwoch, dem 14.07.2021 um 18:20 +0800 schrieb Robin Gong:
> Add 'fw_loaded' and 'is_ram_script' to check if the script used by channel
> is ram script and it's loaded or not, so that could prevent meaningless
> following malloc dma descriptor and bd allocate in sdma_transfer_init(),
> otherwise memory may be consumed out potentially without free in case
> that spi fallback into pio while dma transfer failed by sdma firmware not
> ready(next ERR009165 patch depends on sdma RAM scripts/firmware).
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index 665ccbf..d366198 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ struct sdma_channel {
> enum dma_status status;
> struct imx_dma_data data;
> struct work_struct terminate_worker;
> + bool is_ram_script;
> };
>
> #define IMX_DMA_SG_LOOP BIT(0)
> @@ -498,6 +499,7 @@ struct sdma_engine {
> struct sdma_buffer_descriptor *bd0;
> /* clock ratio for AHB:SDMA core. 1:1 is 1, 2:1 is 0*/
> bool clk_ratio;
> + bool fw_loaded;
> };
>
> static int sdma_config_write(struct dma_chan *chan,
> @@ -918,6 +920,7 @@ static void sdma_get_pc(struct sdma_channel *sdmac,
> sdmac->pc_to_device = 0;
> sdmac->device_to_device = 0;
> sdmac->pc_to_pc = 0;
> + sdmac->is_ram_script = false;
>
> switch (peripheral_type) {
> case IMX_DMATYPE_MEMORY:
> @@ -953,6 +956,7 @@ static void sdma_get_pc(struct sdma_channel *sdmac,
> case IMX_DMATYPE_SSI_DUAL:
> per_2_emi = sdma->script_addrs->ssish_2_mcu_addr;
> emi_2_per = sdma->script_addrs->mcu_2_ssish_addr;
> + sdmac->is_ram_script = true;
> break;
> case IMX_DMATYPE_SSI_SP:
> case IMX_DMATYPE_MMC:
> @@ -967,6 +971,7 @@ static void sdma_get_pc(struct sdma_channel *sdmac,
> per_2_emi = sdma->script_addrs->asrc_2_mcu_addr;
> emi_2_per = sdma->script_addrs->asrc_2_mcu_addr;
> per_2_per = sdma->script_addrs->per_2_per_addr;
> + sdmac->is_ram_script = true;
> break;
> case IMX_DMATYPE_ASRC_SP:
> per_2_emi = sdma->script_addrs->shp_2_mcu_addr;
> @@ -1363,6 +1368,11 @@ static struct sdma_desc *sdma_transfer_init(struct sdma_channel *sdmac,
> {
> struct sdma_desc *desc;
>
> + if (!sdmac->sdma->fw_loaded && sdmac->is_ram_script) {
> + dev_warn_once(sdmac->sdma->dev, "sdma firmware not ready!\n");
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> +
> desc = kzalloc((sizeof(*desc)), GFP_NOWAIT);
> if (!desc)
> goto err_out;
> @@ -1792,6 +1802,8 @@ static void sdma_load_firmware(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>
> sdma_add_scripts(sdma, addr);
>
> + sdma->fw_loaded = true;
> +
> dev_info(sdma->dev, "loaded firmware %d.%d\n",
> header->version_major,
> header->version_minor);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists