lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR08MB4376DB011A86FCD8C76FE80DF7139@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 08:33:10 +0000
From:   Justin He <Justin.He@....com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, nd <nd@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] fs: introduce helper d_path_unsafe()

Hi Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin He
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 1:49 PM
> To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>; Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>;
> Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>; Rasmus Villemoes
> <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Alexander
> Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>; Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-
> foundation.org>; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>; Eric
> Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>; Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>;
> linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>; Christoph
> Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>; nd <nd@....com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/4] fs: introduce helper d_path_unsafe()
> 
> Hi Andy
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 5:11 PM
> > To: Justin He <Justin.He@....com>
> > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>; Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>;
> > Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>; Rasmus Villemoes
> > <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>; Alexander
> > Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>; Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-
> > foundation.org>; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>; Eric
> > Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>; Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@...utronix.de>;
> > linux-doc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>; Christoph
> > Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>; nd <nd@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] fs: introduce helper d_path_unsafe()
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 01:50:08PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > > This helper is similar to d_path() except that it doesn't take any
> > > seqlock/spinlock. It is typical for debugging purposes. Besides,
> > > an additional return value *prenpend_len* is used to get the full
> > > path length of the dentry, ingoring the tail '\0'.
> > > the full path length = end - buf - prepend_length - 1.
> > >
> > > Previously it will skip the prepend_name() loop at once in
> > > __prepen_path() when the buffer length is not enough or even negative.
> > > prepend_name_with_len() will get the full length of dentry name
> > > together with the parent recursively regardless of the buffer length.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >  /**
> > >   * prepend_name - prepend a pathname in front of current buffer
> pointer
> > > - * @buffer: buffer pointer
> > > - * @buflen: allocated length of the buffer
> > > - * @name:   name string and length qstr structure
> > > + * @p: prepend buffer which contains buffer pointer and allocated
> length
> > > + * @name: name string and length qstr structure
> > >   *
> > >   * With RCU path tracing, it may race with d_move(). Use READ_ONCE()
> to
> > >   * make sure that either the old or the new name pointer and length
> are
> >
> > This should be separate patch. You are sending new version too fast...
> > Instead of speeding up it will slow down the review process.
> 
> Okay, sorry about sending the new version too fast.
> I will slow it down and check carefully before sending out.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > +	const char *dname = smp_load_acquire(&name->name); /* ^^^ */
> >
> > I have commented on the comment here. What does it mean for mere reader?
> >
> 
> Do you suggest making the comment "/* ^^^ */" more clear?
> It is detailed already in prepend_name_with_len()'s comments:
> > * Load acquire is needed to make sure that we see that terminating NUL,
> > * which is similar to prepend_name().
> 
> Or do you suggest removing the smp_load_acquire()?

This smp_load_acquire() is to add a barrier btw ->name and ->len. This is the
pair of smp_store_release() in __d_alloc().
Please see the details in 
commit 7088efa9137a15d7d21e3abce73e40c9c8a18d68

    fs/dcache: Use release-acquire for name/length update
    
    The code in __d_alloc() carefully orders filling in the NUL character
    of the name (and the length, hash, and the name itself) with assigning
    of the name itself.  However, prepend_name() does not order the accesses
    to the ->name and ->len fields, other than on TSO systems.  This commit
    therefore replaces prepend_name()'s READ_ONCE() of ->name with an
    smp_load_acquire(), which orders against the subsequent READ_ONCE() of
    ->len.  Because READ_ONCE() now incorporates smp_read_barrier_depends(),
    prepend_name()'s smp_read_barrier_depends() is removed.  Finally,
    to save a line, the smp_wmb()/store pair in __d_alloc() is replaced
    by smp_store_release().

I prefer to keep it as previous, what do you think of it?


--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ