linux-kernel - Re: [patch 16/50] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210714085557.GD2725@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:55:57 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 16/50] locking/rtmutex: Use rt_mutex_wake_q_head

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 05:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +	DEFINE_RT_MUTEX_WAKE_Q_HEAD(wqh);
> -	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);

The naming doesn't really line up nicely... Would DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q()
work?