[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210714125652.eohw2s2pncplxovx@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 15:56:52 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>, bskeggs@...hat.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nouveau: failed to initialise sync
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 08:58:37AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> yes nouveau was using the same functionality for internal BOs without
> noticing it. This is fixes by the following commit:
>
> commit d098775ed44021293b1962dea61efb19297b8d02
> Author: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> Date: Wed Jun 9 19:25:56 2021 +0200
>
> drm/nouveau: init the base GEM fields for internal BOs
>
> TTMs buffer objects are based on GEM objects for quite a while
> and rely on initializing those fields before initializing the TTM BO.
>
> Nouveau now doesn't init the GEM object for internally allocated BOs,
> so make sure that we at least initialize some necessary fields.
>
> Could be that the patch needs to be send to stable as well.
The regression is present in v5.14-rc1. Any idea when it will hit
upstream? I don't see it being applied to drm=next.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists