[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210714021042.56hnr73wzrie3jzj@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:40:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wsa@...nel.org,
wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com, arnd@...db.de,
jasowang@...hat.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com, conghui.chen@...el.com,
stefanha@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
On 13-07-21, 11:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I think we should tweak this such that we add multiple buffers but
> only make them visible to host after all add commands were successful.
> With split this is possible by deffering avail idx update,
> with packed by deferring update of the avail bit in the descriptor.
> I'll write a patch to add an API like that to virtio, then we
> can switch to that.
That will be great, exactly what we wanted but didn't ask for :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists