linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] fpga: dfl: expose feature revision from struct dfl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 07:30:17 -0700
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     Martin Hundebøll <mhu@...icom.dk>,
        Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>,
        Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
        Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] fpga: dfl: expose feature revision from struct
 dfl_device


On 7/14/21 4:14 AM, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2021 16.10, Tom Rix wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
>>> index 511b20ff35a3..9381c579d1cd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
>>> @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ dfl_dev_add(struct dfl_feature_platform_data 
>>> *pdata,
>>>       ddev->type = feature_dev_id_type(pdev);
>>>       ddev->feature_id = feature->id;
>>> +    ddev->revision = feature->revision;
>>>       ddev->cdev = pdata->dfl_cdev;
>>>       /* add mmio resource */
>>> @@ -717,6 +718,7 @@ struct build_feature_devs_info {
>>>    */
>>>   struct dfl_feature_info {
>>>       u16 fid;
>>> +    u8 rev;
>>
>> In other places 'revision' is the element name.
>>
>> For consistency, change rev to revision
>
> So is fid vs. feature. I deliberately chose 'rev' to be consistent
> with other elements in struct dfl_feature_info.

Consistence for revision is important because we want to make it easy 
for folks using grep to search for one string not several.

fid vs feature_id is a problem, but one you do not need to solve.

Tom


>
> // Martin
>