linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:05:12 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> In short I'd say: missing feedback.

Uh, with all due respect: Fuck you.

I've provided feedback, and Paragon have done a fantastic job of
responding to it.  Pretending that the filesystem has simply been
ignored is hugely disrespectful of my time and those at Paragon.

I'm supportive of ntfs3 being included, FWIW.  It looks to be
in much better shape than the existing fs/ntfs.