linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: __unmap_hugepage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YPCEEHEAA9ifubts@t490s>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:53:04 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/hugetlb: __unmap_hugepage_range() can be static

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 01:05:24AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> mm/hugetlb.c:4334:6: warning: symbol '__unmap_hugepage_range' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
>  hugetlb.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 924553aa8f789ad..4bdd637b0c29a95 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4331,9 +4331,9 @@ int copy_hugetlb_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> -			    unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> -			    struct page *ref_page)
> +static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +				   unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> +				   struct page *ref_page)
>  {
>  	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
>  	unsigned long address;

Will squash this change into the patch.  Thanks.

-- 
Peter Xu