linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 091/138] block: Add bio_for_each_folio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210715211254.GE22357@magnolia>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:12:54 -0700
From:   "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 091/138] block: Add bio_for_each_folio_all()

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 04:36:17AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Allow callers to iterate over each folio instead of each page.  The
> bio need not have been constructed using folios originally.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/bio.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
> index ade93e2de6a1..d462bbc95c4b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static inline void bio_advance_iter_single(const struct bio *bio,
>   */
>  #define bio_for_each_bvec_all(bvl, bio, i)		\
>  	for (i = 0, bvl = bio_first_bvec_all(bio);	\
> -	     i < (bio)->bi_vcnt; i++, bvl++)		\
> +	     i < (bio)->bi_vcnt; i++, bvl++)
>  
>  #define bio_iter_last(bvec, iter) ((iter).bi_size == (bvec).bv_len)
>  
> @@ -314,6 +314,47 @@ static inline struct bio_vec *bio_last_bvec_all(struct bio *bio)
>  	return &bio->bi_io_vec[bio->bi_vcnt - 1];
>  }
>  
> +struct folio_iter {
> +	struct folio *folio;
> +	size_t offset;
> +	size_t length;

Hm... so after every bio_{first,next}_folio call, we can access the
folio, the offset, and the length (both in units of bytes) within the
folio?

> +	size_t _seg_count;
> +	int _i;

And these are private variables that the iteration code should not
scribble over?

> +};
> +
> +static inline
> +void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio, int i)
> +{
> +	struct bio_vec *bvec = bio_first_bvec_all(bio) + i;
> +
> +	fi->folio = page_folio(bvec->bv_page);
> +	fi->offset = bvec->bv_offset +
> +			PAGE_SIZE * (bvec->bv_page - &fi->folio->page);
> +	fi->_seg_count = bvec->bv_len;
> +	fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio) - fi->offset, fi->_seg_count);
> +	fi->_i = i;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void bio_next_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio)
> +{
> +	fi->_seg_count -= fi->length;
> +	if (fi->_seg_count) {
> +		fi->folio = folio_next(fi->folio);
> +		fi->offset = 0;
> +		fi->length = min(folio_size(fi->folio), fi->_seg_count);
> +	} else if (fi->_i + 1 < bio->bi_vcnt) {
> +		bio_first_folio(fi, bio, fi->_i + 1);
> +	} else {
> +		fi->folio = NULL;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Iterate over each folio in a bio.
> + */
> +#define bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio)				\
> +	for (bio_first_folio(&fi, bio, 0); fi.folio; bio_next_folio(&fi, bio))

...so I guess a sample iteration loop would be something like:

	struct bio *bio = <get one from somewhere>;
	struct folio_iter fi;

	bio_for_each_folio_all(fi, bio) {
		if (folio_test_dirty(fi.folio))
			printk("folio idx 0x%lx is dirty, i hates dirty data!",
					folio_index(fi.folio));
			panic();
	}

I'll go look through the rest of the patches, but this so far looks
pretty straightforward to me.

--D

> +
>  enum bip_flags {
>  	BIP_BLOCK_INTEGRITY	= 1 << 0, /* block layer owns integrity data */
>  	BIP_MAPPED_INTEGRITY	= 1 << 1, /* ref tag has been remapped */
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>