linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:50:30 -0400
From:   Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>
To:     zajec5@...il.com
Cc:     almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com, djwong@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        willy@...radead.org, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1

On Wed, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:18 PM "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@...il.com> wrote:
>
> What I meant (but failed to write clearly) is missing feedback on *the
> latest* patchset.
> 
> I highly appreciate everyone who took time and helped polishing that
> filesystem to its latest form.

As the person who tested the latest ntfs3 patchset, and had tested
many of those iterations in the past, I would really like to see
this *finally* land in Linux 5.14.

However, I get the feeling it's not going to make it for 5.14 *or*
5.15, and it seems like Paragon became discouraged by the lack of
feedback on the latest revision.

I know that compared to all you awesome folks, I'm just a lowly
user, but it's been frustrating to see nothing happen for months
with something that has a seriously high impact for a lot of people.

It's a shame, because the ntfs3 driver is miles better than the
current ntfs one, and is a solid replacement for the unmaintained
ntfs-3g FUSE implementation.

-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!