[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210715215029.2689112-1-ngompa13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:50:30 -0400
From: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>
To: zajec5@...il.com
Cc: almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com, djwong@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hdegoede@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
willy@...radead.org, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] vboxsf fixes for 5.14-1
On Wed, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:18 PM "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@...il.com> wrote:
>
> What I meant (but failed to write clearly) is missing feedback on *the
> latest* patchset.
>
> I highly appreciate everyone who took time and helped polishing that
> filesystem to its latest form.
As the person who tested the latest ntfs3 patchset, and had tested
many of those iterations in the past, I would really like to see
this *finally* land in Linux 5.14.
However, I get the feeling it's not going to make it for 5.14 *or*
5.15, and it seems like Paragon became discouraged by the lack of
feedback on the latest revision.
I know that compared to all you awesome folks, I'm just a lowly
user, but it's been frustrating to see nothing happen for months
with something that has a seriously high impact for a lot of people.
It's a shame, because the ntfs3 driver is miles better than the
current ntfs one, and is a solid replacement for the unmaintained
ntfs-3g FUSE implementation.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists