[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210715222817.tjsotu7fuhwz37ki@garbanzo>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:28:17 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Anirudh Rayabharam <mail@...rudhrb.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+77cea49e091776a57689@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware_loader: Fix use-after-free Read in
firmware_loading_store
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 10:38:12AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> However I am seeing the following over and over again in the
> log - hence I think it is safer to check the aborted status
> in __fw_load_abort().
>
> ? __list_del_entry_valid+0xe0/0xf0
> [ 348.604808][T12994] __list_del_entry_valid+0xe0/0xf0
> [ 348.610020][T12994] firmware_loading_store+0x141/0x650
> [ 348.615761][T12994] ? firmware_data_write+0x4e0/0x4e0
> [ 348.621064][T12994] ? sysfs_file_ops+0x1c0/0x1c0
> [ 348.625921][T12994] dev_attr_store+0x50/0x80
>
> Also the fallback logic takes actions based on errors as in
> fw_load_sysfs_fallback() that returns -EAGAIN which would
> trigger request_firmware() again.
>
> Based on all of this I think this fix is needed, if only I can
> test for sure.
Shuah, curious if you had read this patch from Anirudh Rayabharam
and my response to that v4 patch iteration?
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210518155921.4181-1-mail@anirudhrb.com
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists