[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6289896.mzcYPaeBD7@diego>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:45:10 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
Hi Geert,
Am Mittwoch, 14. Juli 2021, 11:53:15 CEST schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
> Merely enabling CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST should not enable additional code.
> To fix this, restrict the automatic enabling of ROCKCHIP_GRF to
> ARCH_ROCKCHIP, and ask the user in case of compile-testing.
>
> Fixes: 4c58063d4258f6be ("soc: rockchip: add driver handling grf setup")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
I had the original patch picked already, just not pushed yet.
So hopefully nothing changed between the sends.
Heiko
> ---
> drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig
> index 2c13bf4dd5dbee76..25eb2c1e31bb2a08 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ if ARCH_ROCKCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
> #
>
> config ROCKCHIP_GRF
> - bool
> - default y
> + bool "Rockchip General Register Files support" if COMPILE_TEST
> + default y if ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> help
> The General Register Files are a central component providing
> special additional settings registers for a lot of soc-components.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists