| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 16:48:34 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] perf workqueue: add threadpool start and stop functions
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:11 AM Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This patch adds the start and stop functions, alongside the thread
> function.
> Each thread will run until a stop signal is received.
> Furthermore, start and stop are added to the test.
>
> Thread management is based on the prototype from Alexey:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1625227739.git.alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com/
>
> Suggested-by: Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/workqueue.c | 13 ++
> tools/perf/util/workqueue/threadpool.c | 238 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/workqueue/threadpool.h | 5 +
> 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/workqueue.c b/tools/perf/tests/workqueue.c
> index 1bd4d78c13eb3b14..be377e9897bab4e9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/workqueue.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/workqueue.c
> @@ -10,16 +10,29 @@ struct threadpool_test_args_t {
>
> static int __threadpool__prepare(struct threadpool_struct **pool, int pool_size)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> *pool = create_threadpool(pool_size);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("threadpool creation failure", *pool != NULL);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("threadpool size is wrong",
> threadpool_size(*pool) == pool_size);
>
> + ret = start_threadpool(*pool);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("threadpool start failure", ret == 0);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("threadpool is not ready", threadpool_is_ready(*pool));
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int __threadpool__teardown(struct threadpool_struct *pool)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = stop_threadpool(pool);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("threadpool start failure", ret == 0);
s/start/stop/
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("stopped threadpool is ready",
> + !threadpool_is_ready(pool));
> +
> destroy_threadpool(pool);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/workqueue/threadpool.c b/tools/perf/util/workqueue/threadpool.c
> index 70c67569f956a3e2..f4635ff782b9388e 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/workqueue/threadpool.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/workqueue/threadpool.c
[SNIP]
> +/**
> + * wait_thread - receive ack from thread
> + *
> + * NB: call only from main thread!
> + */
> +static int wait_thread(struct thread_struct *thread)
> +{
> + int res;
> + enum thread_msg msg = THREAD_MSG__UNDEFINED;
> +
> + res = read(thread->pipes.from[0], &msg, sizeof(msg));
> + if (res < 0) {
Maybe it needs to handle -EINTR.
> + pr_err("threadpool: failed to recv msg from tid=%d: %s\n",
> + thread->tid, strerror(errno));
> + return -1;
> + }
> + if (msg != THREAD_MSG__ACK) {
> + pr_err("threadpool: received unexpected msg from tid=%d: %s\n",
> + thread->tid, thread_msg_tags[msg]);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug2("threadpool: received ack from tid=%d\n", thread->tid);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * terminate_thread - send stop signal to thread and wait for ack
> + *
> + * NB: call only from main thread!
> + */
> +static int terminate_thread(struct thread_struct *thread)
> +{
> + int res;
> + enum thread_msg msg = THREAD_MSG__STOP;
> +
> + res = write(thread->pipes.to[1], &msg, sizeof(msg));
> + if (res < 0) {
> + pr_err("threadpool: error sending stop msg to tid=%d: %s\n",
> + thread->tid, strerror(errno));
> + return res;
> + }
> +
> + res = wait_thread(thread);
> +
> + return res;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * threadpool_thread - function running on thread
> + *
> + * This function waits for a signal from main thread to start executing
> + * a task.
> + * On completion, it will go back to sleep, waiting for another signal.
> + * Signals are delivered through pipes.
> + */
> +static void *threadpool_thread(void *args)
> +{
> + struct thread_struct *thread = (struct thread_struct *) args;
> + enum thread_msg msg;
> + int err;
> +
> + thread->tid = gettid();
> +
> + pr_debug2("threadpool[%d]: started\n", thread->tid);
> +
> + for (;;) {
> + msg = THREAD_MSG__ACK;
> + err = write(thread->pipes.from[1], &msg, sizeof(msg));
> + if (err == -1) {
> + pr_err("threadpool[%d]: failed to send ack: %s\n",
> + thread->tid, strerror(errno));
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + msg = THREAD_MSG__UNDEFINED;
> + err = read(thread->pipes.to[0], &msg, sizeof(msg));
> + if (err < 0) {
> + pr_err("threadpool[%d]: error receiving msg: %s\n",
> + thread->tid, strerror(errno));
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (msg != THREAD_MSG__WAKE && msg != THREAD_MSG__STOP) {
> + pr_err("threadpool[%d]: received unexpected msg: %s\n",
> + thread->tid, thread_msg_tags[msg]);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (msg == THREAD_MSG__STOP)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + pr_debug2("threadpool[%d]: exit\n", thread->tid);
> +
> + msg = THREAD_MSG__ACK;
> + err = write(thread->pipes.from[1], &msg, sizeof(msg));
> + if (err == -1) {
> + pr_err("threadpool[%d]: failed to send ack: %s\n",
> + thread->tid, strerror(errno));
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * create_threadpool - create a fixed threadpool with @n_threads threads
> */
> @@ -173,3 +306,108 @@ int threadpool_size(struct threadpool_struct *pool)
> {
> return pool->nr_threads;
> }
> +
> +/**
> + * __start_threadpool - start all threads in the pool.
> + *
> + * This function does not change @pool->status.
> + */
> +static int __start_threadpool(struct threadpool_struct *pool)
> +{
> + int t, tt, ret = 0, nr_threads = pool->nr_threads;
> + sigset_t full, mask;
> + pthread_t handle;
> + pthread_attr_t attrs;
> +
> + sigfillset(&full);
> + if (sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &full, &mask)) {
> + pr_err("Failed to block signals on threads start: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + pthread_attr_init(&attrs);
> + pthread_attr_setdetachstate(&attrs, PTHREAD_CREATE_DETACHED);
> +
> + for (t = 0; t < nr_threads; t++) {
> + struct thread_struct *thread = &pool->threads[t];
> +
> + if (pthread_create(&handle, &attrs, threadpool_thread, thread)) {
> + for (tt = 1; tt < t; tt++)
> + terminate_thread(thread);
> + pr_err("Failed to start threads: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out_free_attr;
> + }
> +
> + if (wait_thread(thread)) {
> + for (tt = 1; tt <= t; tt++)
> + terminate_thread(thread);
> + ret = -1;
> + goto out_free_attr;
> + }
> + }
Isn't it better doing this way?
for (t = 0; t < nr_threads; t++) {
pthread_create(t)
}
for (t = 0; t < nr_threads; t++) {
wait_thread(t)
}
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +
> +out_free_attr:
> + pthread_attr_destroy(&attrs);
> +
> + if (sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &mask, NULL)) {
> + pr_err("Failed to unblock signals on threads start: %s\n",
> + strerror(errno));
> + ret = -1;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists