linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with the dmaengine-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210715114055.4eba03e2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:40:55 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with the
 dmaengine-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the dmaengine tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/dma/idxd/submit.c

between commit:

  da435aedb00a ("dmaengine: idxd: fix array index when int_handles are being used")

from the dmaengine-fixes tree and commit:

  6cfd9e62e329 ("dmaengine: idxd: assign MSIX vectors to each WQ rather than roundrobin")

from the dmaengine tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped