linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 024/108] ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: Fix gpio function name for pads GPIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210715071658.mwcve4wghdoalspk@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 09:16:58 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 024/108] ARM: dts: imx25-pinfunc: Fix gpio
 function name for pads GPIO_[A-F]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 04:59:21PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:35:50PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:36:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > 
> > > [ Upstream commit e0cdd26af8eb9001689a4cde4f72c61c1c4b06be ]
> > > 
> > > The pinfunc definitions used GPIO_A as function instead of GPIO_1_0 as
> > > done for all the other pins with GPIO functionality. Fix for consistency.
> > > 
> > > There are no mainline users that needs adaption.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> > 
> > I'm not convinced it's a good idea to take this patch for stable.
> > in-tree users are unaffected and the only effect this can have on
> > out-of-tree users is to break them. So the gain of having this is not
> > positive.
> > 
> > Am I missing something?
> 
> Hm, if those definitions don't have an in-tree users, why are they still
> around to begin with?

It's hardware description and out-of-tree dts might make use of it. Even
if no in-tree user benefits, it's IMO better to have this included, but
I admit you could judge differently here.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)