[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210715091724.45768-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:17:24 +0800
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Smack: Fix wrong semantics in smk_access_entry()
In the smk_access_entry() function, if no matching rule is found
in the rust_list, a negative error code will be used to perform bit
operations with the MAY_ enumeration value. This is semantically
wrong. This patch fixes this issue.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
security/smack/smack_access.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_access.c b/security/smack/smack_access.c
index 1f391f6a3d47..d2186e2757be 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_access.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_access.c
@@ -81,23 +81,22 @@ int log_policy = SMACK_AUDIT_DENIED;
int smk_access_entry(char *subject_label, char *object_label,
struct list_head *rule_list)
{
- int may = -ENOENT;
struct smack_rule *srp;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(srp, rule_list, list) {
if (srp->smk_object->smk_known == object_label &&
srp->smk_subject->smk_known == subject_label) {
- may = srp->smk_access;
- break;
+ int may = srp->smk_access;
+ /*
+ * MAY_WRITE implies MAY_LOCK.
+ */
+ if ((may & MAY_WRITE) == MAY_WRITE)
+ may |= MAY_LOCK;
+ return may;
}
}
- /*
- * MAY_WRITE implies MAY_LOCK.
- */
- if ((may & MAY_WRITE) == MAY_WRITE)
- may |= MAY_LOCK;
- return may;
+ return -ENOENT;
}
/**
--
2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7
Powered by blists - more mailing lists