lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:51:32 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 5.13-rt1 + KVM = WARNING: at fs/eventfd.c:74 eventfd_signal()

On 15/07/21 10:44, He Zhe wrote:
> It was to increase the recursion depth to 2 so that vhost_worker and
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl syscall could work in parallel

The count is per-CPU, so parallel operations cannot cause it to become 
2.  Your patch might fix calls from ioeventfd to vhost_worker to another 
eventfd, but not *parallel* operation of KVM and vhost (except on 
PREEMPT_RT).

You should identify the exact callstack that caused the warning for 
vDUSE, and document that one in the commit message, so that reviewers 
can understand the issue.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ