lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:05:57 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 5.13-rt1 + KVM = WARNING: at fs/eventfd.c:74 eventfd_signal()

On 15/07/21 12:10, He Zhe wrote:
> The following was provided in this thread. The commit log contains the call traces that I met and fixed back to Apr. 2020.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210618084412.18257-1-zhe.he@windriver.com/

> 001: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1503 at fs/eventfd.c:73 eventfd_signal+0x85/0xa0
> ---- snip ----
> 001: Call Trace:
> 001:  vhost_signal+0x15e/0x1b0 [vhost]
> 001:  vhost_add_used_and_signal_n+0x2b/0x40 [vhost]
> 001:  handle_rx+0xb9/0x900 [vhost_net]
> 001:  handle_rx_net+0x15/0x20 [vhost_net]
> 001:  vhost_worker+0xbe/0x120 [vhost]
> 001:  kthread+0x106/0x140
> 001:  ? log_used.part.0+0x20/0x20 [vhost]
> 001:  ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90
> 001:  ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

This call trace is not of a reentrant call; there is only one call to 
eventfd_signal.  It does fit the symptoms that Daniel reported for 
PREEMPT_RT though.

> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/beac2025-2e11-8ed0-61e2-9f6e633482e8@redhat.com/

This one is about PREEMPT_RT, so it would be fixed by local_lock.

There _may_ be two bugs, so let's start by fixing this one.  Once this 
one is fixed, we will examine the call stacks of any further reports, 
and diagnose whether the second bug (if it exists) is related to vDUSE, 
PREEMPT_RT or neeither.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ