[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <902f7665ab9045e87fb07f848b994316@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:46:02 +0530
From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Make power_on actually
enable the domain
Hey Bjorn,
Thanks for the patch.
On 2021-07-03 08:24, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The general expectation is that powering on a power-domain should make
> the power domain deliver some power, and if a specific performace state
s/performace/performance/
> is needed further requests has to be made.
>
> But in contrast with other power-domain implementations (e.g. rpmpd)
> the
> RPMh does not have an interface to enable the power, so the driver has
> to vote for a particular corner (performance level) in rpmh_power_on().
>
> But the corner is never initialized, so a typical request to simply
> enable the power domain would not actually turn on the hardware.
> Further
> more, when no more clients vote for a performance state (i.e. the
> aggregated vote is 0) the power domain would be turn off.
>
> Fix both of these issues by always voting for a corner with non-zero
> value, when the power domain is enabled.
>
> The tracking of the lowest non-zero corner is performed to handle the
> corner case if there's ever a domain with a non-zero lowest corner, in
> which case both rpmh_power_on() and rpmh_rpmhpd_set_performance_state()
> would be allowed to use this lowest corner.
>
> Fixes: 279b7e8a62cc ("soc: qcom: rpmhpd: Add RPMh power domain driver")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Resending because the hunk in rpmhpd_update_level_mapping() was left in
> the
> index.
>
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> index fa209b479ab3..76ea6b053ef0 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmhpd.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> * @active_only: True if it represents an Active only peer
> * @corner: current corner
> * @active_corner: current active corner
> + * @enable_corner: lowest non-zero corner
> * @level: An array of level (vlvl) to corner (hlvl) mappings
> * derived from cmd-db
> * @level_count: Number of levels supported by the power domain. max
> @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ struct rpmhpd {
> const bool active_only;
> unsigned int corner;
> unsigned int active_corner;
> + unsigned int enable_corner;
> u32 level[RPMH_ARC_MAX_LEVELS];
> size_t level_count;
> bool enabled;
> @@ -385,13 +387,13 @@ static int rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(struct rpmhpd
> *pd, unsigned int corner)
> static int rpmhpd_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
> {
> struct rpmhpd *pd = domain_to_rpmhpd(domain);
> - int ret = 0;
> + unsigned int corner;
> + int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&rpmhpd_lock);
>
> - if (pd->corner)
> - ret = rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(pd, pd->corner);
> -
> + corner = max(pd->corner, pd->enable_corner);
> + ret = rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(pd, corner);
> if (!ret)
> pd->enabled = true;
>
> @@ -436,6 +438,10 @@ static int rpmhpd_set_performance_state(struct
> generic_pm_domain *domain,
> i--;
>
> if (pd->enabled) {
> + /* Ensure that the domain isn't turn off */
> + if (i < pd->enable_corner)
> + i = pd->enable_corner;
> +
> ret = rpmhpd_aggregate_corner(pd, i);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> @@ -472,6 +478,10 @@ static int rpmhpd_update_level_mapping(struct
> rpmhpd *rpmhpd)
> for (i = 0; i < rpmhpd->level_count; i++) {
> rpmhpd->level[i] = buf[i];
>
> + /* Remember the first non-zero corner */
Shouldn't we be tracking the corner that
corresponds to the first non-zero level
instead?
> + if (!rpmhpd->enable_corner)
> + rpmhpd->enable_corner = i;
> +
> /*
> * The AUX data may be zero padded. These 0 valued entries at
> * the end of the map must be ignored.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists