[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210715131044.GB4717@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:10:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, maz@...nel.org,
paulmck@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] irq: abstract irqaction handler invocation
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:15:31PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 12:49:54PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:50:30AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> > > index 54363527feea..70a4694cc891 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h
> > > @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
> > > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> > >
> > > +#include <trace/events/irq.h>
> > > +
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> > > # define IRQ_BITMAP_BITS (NR_IRQS + 8196)
> > > #else
> > > @@ -107,6 +109,32 @@ irqreturn_t __handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int *flags
> > > irqreturn_t handle_irq_event_percpu(struct irq_desc *desc);
> > > irqreturn_t handle_irq_event(struct irq_desc *desc);
> > >
> > > +static inline irqreturn_t __handle_irqaction(unsigned int irq,
> > > + struct irqaction *action,
> > > + void *dev_id)
> > > +{
> > > + irqreturn_t res;
> > > +
> > > + trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
> > > + res = action->handler(irq, dev_id);
> > > + trace_irq_handler_exit(irq, action, res);
> > > +
> > > + return res;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline irqreturn_t handle_irqaction(unsigned int irq,
> > > + struct irqaction *action)
> > > +{
> > > + return __handle_irqaction(irq, action, action->dev_id);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline irqreturn_t handle_irqaction_percpu_devid(unsigned int irq,
> > > + struct irqaction *action)
> > > +{
> > > + return __handle_irqaction(irq, action,
> > > + raw_cpu_ptr(action->percpu_dev_id));
> > > +}
> >
> > So I like this patch, it's a nice cleanup.
> >
> > However, you could implement the next patch as a module that hooks into
> > those two tracepoints. Quite possibly the existing IRQ latency tracer
> > would already work for what you need and also provide you a function
> > trace of WTH the CPU was doing.
>
> The issue with the existing tracers is that they're logging for
> later/concurrent analysis, whereas what I need is a notification (e.g. a
> WARN) when the maximum expected latency has been breached. That way it
> gets caught by Syzkaller or whatever without needing to specially manage
> the tracer.
>
> If there's a way to do that (e.g. with boot-time options), I'm happy to
> use that instead; I just couldn't see hwo to do that today, and was
> under the impression that the existing tracepoints don't give quite what
> I need (e.g. since the entry/exit hooks are separate, so I'd have to
> store some state somewhere else).
>
> I'm happy to take another look if you think I'm wrong on that. :)
For this particular thing I think you can use a simple per-cpu variable;
we don't do nested interrupts.
DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, my_timestamp);
static notrace void my_entry(unsigned int irq, struct irq_action *action)
{
this_cpu_write(my_timestamp, sched_clock());
}
static notrace void my_exit(unsigned int irq, struct irq_action *action)
{
u64 delta = sched_clock() - this_cpu_read(my_timestamp);
WARN_ON_ONCE(delta > biggie);
}
__init int mod_init(void)
{
register_trace_irq_handler_exit(my_exit, NULL);
register_trace_irq_handler_entry(my_entry, NULL);
}
Should work, no?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists