linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm64: Plumb MMIO checking into the fault handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210715163159.1480168-6-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:31:48 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     will@...nel.org, qperret@...gle.com, dbrazdil@...gle.com,
        Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...eaurora.org>,
        Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm64: Plumb MMIO checking into the fault handling

Plumb the MMIO checking code into the MMIO fault handling code.
Nothing allows a region to be registered yet, so there should be
no funtional change either.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
index 3dd38a151d2a..fd5747279d27 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
 #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
 
 #include "trace.h"
@@ -130,6 +131,10 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa)
 	int len;
 	u8 data_buf[8];
 
+	/* Check failed? Return to the guest for debriefing... */
+	if (!kvm_check_ioguard_page(vcpu, fault_ipa))
+		return 1;
+
 	/*
 	 * No valid syndrome? Ask userspace for help if it has
 	 * volunteered to do so, and bail out otherwise.
@@ -156,6 +161,11 @@ int io_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa)
 	len = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_as(vcpu);
 	rt = kvm_vcpu_dabt_get_rd(vcpu);
 
+	/* If we cross a page boundary, check that too... */
+	if (((fault_ipa + len - 1) & PAGE_MASK) != (fault_ipa & PAGE_MASK) &&
+	    !kvm_check_ioguard_page(vcpu, fault_ipa + len - 1))
+		return 1;
+
 	if (is_write) {
 		data = vcpu_data_guest_to_host(vcpu, vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rt),
 					       len);
-- 
2.30.2