linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 07/40] x86/sev: Split the physmap when adding the page in RMP table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 15 Jul 2021 12:05:54 -0500
From:   Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergio Lopez <slp@...hat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, tony.luck@...el.com,
        npmccallum@...hat.com, brijesh.ksingh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 RFC v4 07/40] x86/sev: Split the physmap when adding
 the page in RMP table



On 7/14/21 5:25 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> A write from the hypervisor goes through the RMP checks. When the
>> hypervisor writes to pages, hardware checks to ensures that the assigned
>> bit in the RMP is zero (i.e page is shared). If the page table entry that
>> gives the sPA indicates that the target page size is a large page, then
>> all RMP entries for the 4KB constituting pages of the target must have the
>> assigned bit 0. If one of entry does not have assigned bit 0 then hardware
>> will raise an RMP violation. To resolve it, split the page table entry
>> leading to target page into 4K.
> 
> Isn't the above just saying:
> 
>    All RMP entries covered by a large page must match the shared vs. encrypted
>    state of the page, e.g. host large pages must have assigned=0 for all relevant
>    RMP entries.
> 

Yes.


>> @@ -2375,6 +2375,12 @@ int rmpupdate(struct page *page, struct rmpupdate *val)
>>   	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SEV_SNP))
>>   		return -ENXIO;
>>   
>> +	ret = set_memory_4k((unsigned long)page_to_virt(page), 1);
> 
> IIUC, this shatters the direct map for page that's assigned to an SNP guest, and
> the large pages are never recovered?
> 
> I believe a better approach would be to do something similar to memfd_secret[*],
> which encountered a similar problem with the direct map.  Instead of forcing the
> direct map to be forever 4k, unmap the direct map when making a page guest private,
> and restore the direct map when it's made shared (or freed).
> 
> I thought memfd_secret had also solved the problem of restoring large pages in
> the direct map, but at a glance I can't tell if that's actually implemented
> anywhere.  But, even if it's not currently implemented, I think it makes sense
> to mimic the memfd_secret approach so that both features can benefit if large
> page preservation/restoration is ever added.
> 

thanks for the memfd_secrets pointer. At the lowest level it shares the
same logic to split the physmap. We both end up calling to
change_page_attrs_set_clr() which split the page and updates the page
table attributes.

Given this, I believe in future if the change_page_attrs_set_clr() is 
enhanced to track the splitting of the pages and restore it later then 
it should work transparently.

thanks