| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABVgOSn375JYVjv3b92UedyfjnsawpFTXSJfY0cf5wb1hXrZ2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 12:51:12 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kunit: tool: add --kernel_args to allow setting module params
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:08 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> kunit.py currently does not make it possible for users to specify module
> parameters (/kernel arguments more generally) unless one directly tweaks
> the kunit.py code itself.
>
> This hasn't mattered much so far, but this would make it easier to port
> existing tests that expose module parameters over to KUnit and/or let
> current KUnit tests take advantage of them.
>
> Tested using an kunit internal parameter:
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit \
> --kernel_args=kunit.filter_glob=kunit_status
> ...
> Testing complete. 2 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. 0 skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> ---
Thanks! This looks good now:
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
-- David
> v1 -> v2:
> s/kernel_arg/kernel_args in documentation
> v2 -> v3:
> Fix up kunit_tool_test.py, add a test case.
> ---
> .../dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst | 10 ++++++++++
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 16 +++++++++++----
> tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 20 +++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst
> index 7d99386cf94a..ebaaa2764207 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst
> @@ -80,6 +80,16 @@ file ``.kunitconfig``, you can just pass in the dir, e.g.
> automagically, but tests could theoretically depend on incompatible
> options, so handling that would be tricky.
>
> +Setting kernel commandline parameters
> +-------------------------------------
> +
> +You can use ``--kernel_args`` to pass arbitrary kernel arguments, e.g.
> +
> +.. code-block:: bash
> +
> + $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_args=param=42 --kernel_args=param2=false
> +
> +
> Generating code coverage reports under UML
> ------------------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> index be8d8d4a4e08..03f3bc406955 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> @@ -28,12 +28,13 @@ KunitBuildRequest = namedtuple('KunitBuildRequest',
> ['jobs', 'build_dir', 'alltests',
> 'make_options'])
> KunitExecRequest = namedtuple('KunitExecRequest',
> - ['timeout', 'build_dir', 'alltests', 'filter_glob'])
> + ['timeout', 'build_dir', 'alltests',
> + 'filter_glob', 'kernel_args'])
> KunitParseRequest = namedtuple('KunitParseRequest',
> ['raw_output', 'input_data', 'build_dir', 'json'])
> KunitRequest = namedtuple('KunitRequest', ['raw_output','timeout', 'jobs',
> 'build_dir', 'alltests', 'filter_glob',
> - 'json', 'make_options'])
> + 'kernel_args', 'json', 'make_options'])
>
> KernelDirectoryPath = sys.argv[0].split('tools/testing/kunit/')[0]
>
> @@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ def exec_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
> kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp('Starting KUnit Kernel ...')
> test_start = time.time()
> result = linux.run_kernel(
> + args=request.kernel_args,
> timeout=None if request.alltests else request.timeout,
> filter_glob=request.filter_glob,
> build_dir=request.build_dir)
> @@ -150,7 +152,8 @@ def run_tests(linux: kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree,
> return build_result
>
> exec_request = KunitExecRequest(request.timeout, request.build_dir,
> - request.alltests, request.filter_glob)
> + request.alltests, request.filter_glob,
> + request.kernel_args)
> exec_result = exec_tests(linux, exec_request)
> if exec_result.status != KunitStatus.SUCCESS:
> return exec_result
> @@ -236,6 +239,9 @@ def add_exec_opts(parser) -> None:
> nargs='?',
> default='',
> metavar='filter_glob')
> + parser.add_argument('--kernel_args',
> + help='Kernel command-line parameters. Maybe be repeated',
> + action='append')
>
> def add_parse_opts(parser) -> None:
> parser.add_argument('--raw_output', help='don\'t format output from kernel',
> @@ -307,6 +313,7 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> cli_args.build_dir,
> cli_args.alltests,
> cli_args.filter_glob,
> + cli_args.kernel_args,
> cli_args.json,
> cli_args.make_options)
> result = run_tests(linux, request)
> @@ -361,7 +368,8 @@ def main(argv, linux=None):
> exec_request = KunitExecRequest(cli_args.timeout,
> cli_args.build_dir,
> cli_args.alltests,
> - cli_args.filter_glob)
> + cli_args.filter_glob,
> + cli_args.kernel_args)
> exec_result = exec_tests(linux, exec_request)
> parse_request = KunitParseRequest(cli_args.raw_output,
> exec_result.result,
> diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> index bdae0e5f6197..93fda23f446c 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0)
> self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1)
> self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
> - build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> + args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
>
> def test_run_passes_args_pass(self):
> @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
> self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1)
> self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
> - build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> + args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
>
> def test_exec_passes_args_fail(self):
> @@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> timeout = 3453
> kunit.main(['exec', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock)
> self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
> - build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout)
> + args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout)
> self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
>
> def test_run_timeout(self):
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock)
> self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
> self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
> - build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout)
> + args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout)
> self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
>
> def test_run_builddir(self):
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock)
> self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
> self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
> - build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> + args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
>
> def test_config_builddir(self):
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> build_dir = '.kunit'
> kunit.main(['exec', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock)
> self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
> - build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> + args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
>
> @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree')
> @@ -451,5 +451,13 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase):
> cross_compile=None,
> qemu_config_path=None)
>
> + def test_run_kernel_args(self):
> + kunit.main(['run', '--kernel_args=a=1', '--kernel_args=b=2'], self.linux_source_mock)
> + self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1)
> + self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with(
> + args=['a=1','b=2'], build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300)
> + self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))
> +
> +
> if __name__ == '__main__':
> unittest.main()
>
> base-commit: 8096acd7442e613fad0354fc8dfdb2003cceea0b
> --
> 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890-goog
>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4000 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists