[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUYLVHwb1EdLO0D-cAyJAvx=pjHHZNg1wDCmVu+nTBVKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:15:25 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:42 AM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:38:55 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Merely enabling CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST should not enable additional code.
> > To fix this, restrict the automatic enabling of ROCKCHIP_GRF to
> > ARCH_ROCKCHIP, and ask the user in case of compile-testing.
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [1/1] soc: rockchip: ROCKCHIP_GRF should not default to y, unconditionally
> commit: 2a1c55d4762dd34a8b0f2e36fb01b7b16b60735b
>
> I actually found the old one deep down in my inbox some days ago,
> so had applied that one already. Hope nothing changed with your
> RESEND.
They're identical, thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists