[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb750c51-c01a-fb95-4ad5-2fd3f1c625f9@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 11:12:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@...opsys.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Artur Petrosyan <Arthur.Petrosyan@...opsys.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc2: Skip clock gating on Samsung SoCs
On 16/07/2021 11:07, Minas Harutyunyan wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 7/16/2021 12:10 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/07/2021 07:01, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> Commit 0112b7ce68ea ("usb: dwc2: Update dwc2_handle_usb_suspend_intr
>>> function.") changed the way the driver handles power down modes in a such
>>> way that it uses clock gating when no other power down mode is available.
>>>
>>> This however doesn't work well on the DWC2 implementation used on the
>>> Samsung SoCs. When a clock gating is enabled, system hangs. It looks that
>>> the proper clock gating requires some additional glue code in the shared
>>> USB2 PHY and/or Samsung glue code for the DWC2. To restore driver
>>> operation on the Samsung SoCs simply skip enabling clock gating mode
>>> until one finds what is really needed to make it working reliably.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 0112b7ce68ea ("usb: dwc2: Update dwc2_handle_usb_suspend_intr function.")
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/dwc2/core.h | 4 ++++
>>> drivers/usb/dwc2/core_intr.c | 3 ++-
>>> drivers/usb/dwc2/hcd.c | 6 ++++--
>>> drivers/usb/dwc2/params.c | 1 +
>>> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>>
> What mean your "Acked-by" tag? Do you want to mention that this commit
> "Tested-by" or "Reviewed-by" by you?
My "Acked-by" means exactly what Linux process defines:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L426
Acked-by is neither Tested-by nor Reviewed-by. For the definition
of these other tags, please also see link above.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists