lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 16 Jul 2021 16:32:50 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, r.czerwinski@...gutronix.de,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Apple M1 DART IOMMU driver

On 2021-07-16 07:24, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 07:19:50PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Even at the DMA API level you could hide *some* of it (at the cost of
>> effectively only having 1/4 of the usable address space), but there are
>> still cases like where v4l2 has a hard requirement that a page-aligned
>> scatterlist can be mapped into a contiguous region of DMA addresses.
> 
> Where does v4l2 make that broken assumption?  Plenty of dma mapping
> implementations including dma-direct do not support that.

See vb2_dc_get_contiguous_size() and its callers. I still remember 
spending an entire work day on writing one email at the culmination of 
this discussion:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/56409B6D.5090903@arm.com/

809eac54cdd6 was framed as an efficiency improvement because it 
technically was one (and something I had wanted to implement anyway), 
but it was also very much to save myself from any further email debates 
or customer calls about "regressing" code ported from 32-bit platforms...

Robin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ