| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jR5T2+EHXz_RqzMDxb0i9pDhQTDZomWe3po91A7Bb-xg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 19:27:20 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ACPI: utils: Fix reference counting in for_each_acpi_dev_match()
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:32 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Andy - thanks for fixing this
>
> On 12/07/2021 19:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Currently it's possible to iterate over the dangling pointer in case the device
> > suddenly disappears. This may happen becase callers put it at the end of a loop.
> >
> > Instead, let's move that call inside acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev().
> >
> > Fixes: 803abec64ef9 ("media: ipu3-cio2: Add cio2-bridge to ipu3-cio2 driver")
> > Fixes: bf263f64e804 ("media: ACPI / bus: Add acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev() and helper macro")
> > Fixes: edbd1bc4951e ("efi/dev-path-parser: Switch to use for_each_acpi_dev_match()")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Applied as 5.14-rc material, thanks!
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - rebased on top of v5.14-rc1 and hence added fix for EFI code
> > - added kernel documentation update to point out that
> > acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev() drops a reference on the given
> > ACPI device (Rafael)
> >
> > drivers/acpi/utils.c | 7 +++----
> > drivers/firmware/efi/dev-path-parser.c | 1 -
> > drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 6 ++----
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 5 -----
> > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > index e7ddd281afff..d5cedffeeff9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > @@ -860,11 +860,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_dev_present);
> > * Return the next match of ACPI device if another matching device was present
> > * at the moment of invocation, or NULL otherwise.
> > *
> > - * FIXME: The function does not tolerate the sudden disappearance of @adev, e.g.
> > - * in the case of a hotplug event. That said, the caller should ensure that
> > - * this will never happen.
> > - *
> > * The caller is responsible for invoking acpi_dev_put() on the returned device.
> > + * On the other hand the function invokes acpi_dev_put() on the given @adev
> > + * assuming that its reference counter had been increased beforehand.
> > *
> > * See additional information in acpi_dev_present() as well.
> > */
> > @@ -880,6 +878,7 @@ acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *hid, const cha
> > match.hrv = hrv;
> >
> > dev = bus_find_device(&acpi_bus_type, start, &match, acpi_dev_match_cb);
> > + acpi_dev_put(adev);
> > return dev ? to_acpi_device(dev) : NULL;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/dev-path-parser.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/dev-path-parser.c
> > index 10d4457417a4..eb9c65f97841 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/dev-path-parser.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/dev-path-parser.c
> > @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ static long __init parse_acpi_path(const struct efi_dev_path *node,
> > break;
> > if (!adev->pnp.unique_id && node->acpi.uid == 0)
> > break;
> > - acpi_dev_put(adev);
> > }
> > if (!adev)
> > return -ENODEV;
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> > index 4657e99df033..59a36f922675 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> > @@ -173,10 +173,8 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> > int ret;
> >
> > for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, cfg->hid, NULL, -1) {
> > - if (!adev->status.enabled) {
> > - acpi_dev_put(adev);
> > + if (!adev->status.enabled)
> > continue;
> > - }
> >
> > if (bridge->n_sensors >= CIO2_NUM_PORTS) {
> > acpi_dev_put(adev);
> > @@ -185,7 +183,6 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> > }
> >
> > sensor = &bridge->sensors[bridge->n_sensors];
> > - sensor->adev = adev;
> > strscpy(sensor->name, cfg->hid, sizeof(sensor->name));
> >
> > ret = cio2_bridge_read_acpi_buffer(adev, "SSDB",
> > @@ -215,6 +212,7 @@ static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensor(const struct cio2_sensor_config *cfg,
> > goto err_free_swnodes;
> > }
> >
> > + sensor->adev = acpi_dev_get(adev);
> > adev->fwnode.secondary = fwnode;
> >
> > dev_info(&cio2->dev, "Found supported sensor %s\n",
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 1ae993fee4a5..b9d434a93632 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -707,11 +707,6 @@ acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(const char *hid, const char *uid, s64 hrv);
> > * @hrv: Hardware Revision of the device, pass -1 to not check _HRV
> > *
> > * The caller is responsible for invoking acpi_dev_put() on the returned device.
> > - *
> > - * FIXME: Due to above requirement there is a window that may invalidate @adev
> > - * and next iteration will use a dangling pointer, e.g. in the case of a
> > - * hotplug event. That said, the caller should ensure that this will never
> > - * happen.
> > */
> > #define for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, hid, uid, hrv) \
> > for (adev = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(hid, uid, hrv); \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists