linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.13 000/266] 5.13.3-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YPHLEAE5XLR3r7dn@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:08:16 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, svens@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.13 000/266] 5.13.3-rc1 review

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 04:40:55PM -0500, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 14:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.13.3 release.
> > There are 266 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 17 Jul 2021 18:21:07 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.13.3-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.13.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Build regressions have been found on this release candidate (and on 5.12-rc).
> 
> ## Regressions (compared to v5.13.2)
> * s390, build
>   - clang-10-allnoconfig
>   - clang-10-defconfig
>   - clang-10-tinyconfig
>   - clang-11-allnoconfig
>   - clang-11-defconfig
>   - clang-11-tinyconfig
>   - clang-12-allnoconfig
>   - clang-12-defconfig
>   - clang-12-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-8-allnoconfig
>   - gcc-8-defconfig
>   - gcc-8-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-9-allnoconfig
>   - gcc-9-defconfig
>   - gcc-9-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-10-allnoconfig
>   - gcc-10-defconfig
>   - gcc-10-tinyconfig
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
> 
> [...]
> > Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
> >     s390/signal: switch to using vdso for sigreturn and syscall restart
> [...]
> 
> Our bisections pointed to this commit. Reverting it made the build pass again.
> 

Now dropped, thanks.

greg k-h