[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bza3X410=1ryu4xZ+5ST2=69CB9BDusBrLMX=VSsXtnuDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:27:18 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Shuyi Cheng <chengshuyi@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] selftests/bpf: Switches existing
selftests to using open_opts for custom BTF
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:43 AM Shuyi Cheng
<chengshuyi@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> This patch mainly replaces the bpf_object_load_attr of
> the core_autosize.c and core_reloc.c files with bpf_object_open_opts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuyi Cheng <chengshuyi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_autosize.c | 22 ++++++++---------
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c | 28 ++++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
So I applied this, but it's obvious you haven't bothered even
*building* selftests, because it had at least one compilation warning
and one compilation *error*, not building test_progs at all. I've
noted stuff I fixed (and still remember) below. I understand it might
be your first kernel contribution, but it's not acceptable to submit
patches that don't build. Next time please be more thorough.
[...]
>
> - load_attr.obj = skel->obj;
> - load_attr.target_btf_path = btf_file;
> - err = bpf_object__load_xattr(&load_attr);
> + err = bpf_object__load(skel);
This didn't compile outright, because it should have been
test_core_autosize__load(skel).
> if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "bad_prog_load"))
> goto cleanup;
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
> index d02e064..10eb2407 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c
> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static size_t roundup_page(size_t sz)
> void test_core_reloc(void)
> {
> const size_t mmap_sz = roundup_page(sizeof(struct data));
> - struct bpf_object_load_attr load_attr = {};
> + struct bpf_object_open_opts open_opts = {};
> struct core_reloc_test_case *test_case;
> const char *tp_name, *probe_name;
> int err, i, equal;
> @@ -846,9 +846,17 @@ void test_core_reloc(void)
> continue;
> }
>
> - obj = bpf_object__open_file(test_case->bpf_obj_file, NULL);
> + if (test_case->btf_src_file) {
> + err = access(test_case->btf_src_file, R_OK);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "btf_src_file"))
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> + open_opts.btf_custom_path = test_case->btf_src_file;
This was reporting a valid warning about dropping const modifier. For
good reason, becyase btf_custom_path in open_opts should have been
`const char *`, I fixed that.
> + open_opts.sz = sizeof(struct bpf_object_open_opts);
> + obj = bpf_object__open_file(test_case->bpf_obj_file, &open_opts);
> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(obj, "obj_open"))
> - continue;
> + goto cleanup;
>
> probe_name = "raw_tracepoint/sys_enter";
> tp_name = "sys_enter";
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists