lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPLw0uc1jVKI8uKo@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:01:38 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Andreas Grünbacher 
        <andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
        Liu Bo <bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Liu Jiang <gerry@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iomap: support tail packing inline read

On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 09:38:18PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Sorry about some late. I've revised a version based on Christoph's
> version and Matthew's thought above. I've preliminary checked with
> EROFS, if it does make sense, please kindly help check on the gfs2
> side as well..

I don't understand how this bit works:

>  	struct page *page = ctx->cur_page;
> -	struct iomap_page *iop;
> +	struct iomap_page *iop = NULL;
>  	bool same_page = false, is_contig = false;
>  	loff_t orig_pos = pos;
>  	unsigned poff, plen;
>  	sector_t sector;
>  
> -	if (iomap->type == IOMAP_INLINE) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE(pos);
> -		iomap_read_inline_data(inode, page, iomap);
> -		return PAGE_SIZE;
> -	}
> +	if (iomap->type == IOMAP_INLINE && !pos)
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(to_iomap_page(page) != NULL);
> +	else
> +		iop = iomap_page_create(inode, page);

Imagine you have a file with bytes 0-2047 in an extent which is !INLINE
and bytes 2048-2051 in the INLINE extent.  When you read the page, first
you create an iop for the !INLINE extent.  Then this function is called
again for the INLINE extent and you'll hit the WARN_ON_ONCE.  No?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ