[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210717175925.17091e96@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:59:25 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: buffer: Move a sanity check at the beginning
of 'iio_scan_mask_set()'
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:14:51 +0200
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> wrote:
> This is more standard to have sanity checks at the entry of a function,
> instead of allocating some memory first and having to free it if a
> condition is not met.
Indeed this is silly. I'd guess result of code evolution, but perhaps
I was crazy in the first place :)
Applied,
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Shuffle code a bit to check 'masklength' before calling 'bitmap_alloc()'
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> index 6d4776a7f002..a95cc2da56be 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> @@ -354,13 +354,14 @@ static int iio_scan_mask_set(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> const unsigned long *mask;
> unsigned long *trialmask;
>
> - trialmask = bitmap_alloc(indio_dev->masklength, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!trialmask)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> if (!indio_dev->masklength) {
> WARN(1, "Trying to set scanmask prior to registering buffer\n");
> - goto err_invalid_mask;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> + trialmask = bitmap_alloc(indio_dev->masklength, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!trialmask)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> bitmap_copy(trialmask, buffer->scan_mask, indio_dev->masklength);
> set_bit(bit, trialmask);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists