linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] spi: spi-altera-dfl: support n5010 feature revision

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:56:05 -0700
From:   Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Martin Hundebøll <martin@...nix.com>,
        Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Martin Hundebøll <mhu@...icom.dk>,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] spi: spi-altera-dfl: support n5010 feature
 revision

On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 06:33:35PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 03:54:40PM +0200, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> > From: Martin Hundebøll <mhu@...icom.dk>
> > 
> > The Max10 BMC on the Silicom n5010 PAC is slightly different than the
> > existing BMCs, so use a dedicated feature revision detect it.
> 
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>

Mark do you want me to provide a tag for this and the previous commit to
avoid conflicts for other FPGA changes or do you think it's easier to
just pick both of them up through FPGA or SPI tree?

- Moritz