[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210717065911.61497-3-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 14:59:09 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <hannes@...xchg.org>, <vbabka@...e.cz>, <mhocko@...e.com>,
<axboe@...nel.dk>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, <alexs@...nel.org>,
<apopple@...dia.com>, <willy@...radead.org>, <minchan@...nel.org>,
<david@...hat.com>, <shli@...com>, <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
<yuzhao@...gle.com>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/vmscan: remove misleading setting to sc->priority
The priority field of sc is used to control how many pages we should scan
at once while we always traverse the list to shrink the pages in these
functions. So these settings are unneeded and misleading.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 92a515e82b1b..a55266685eb5 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1704,7 +1704,6 @@ unsigned int reclaim_clean_pages_from_list(struct zone *zone,
{
struct scan_control sc = {
.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
- .priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
.may_unmap = 1,
};
struct reclaim_stat stat;
@@ -2329,7 +2328,6 @@ unsigned long reclaim_pages(struct list_head *page_list)
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
struct scan_control sc = {
.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
- .priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
.may_writepage = 1,
.may_unmap = 1,
.may_swap = 1,
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists