linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm, memcg: inline mem_cgroup_{charge/uncharge} to improve disabled memcg config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJuCfpH-E9wJZysL7g8wvD1t62tkSoxjRzr0-aCYn-5XK8KUzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 18 Jul 2021 14:32:02 -0700
From:   Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, apopple@...dia.com,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        cgroups mailinglist <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm, memcg: inline mem_cgroup_{charge/uncharge} to
 improve disabled memcg config

On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 2:30 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 02:25:50PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 9:56 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 05:36:25PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > @@ -6723,7 +6722,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  /**
> > > > - * mem_cgroup_charge - charge a newly allocated page to a cgroup
> > > > + * __mem_cgroup_charge - charge a newly allocated page to a cgroup
> > > >   * @page: page to charge
> > > >   * @mm: mm context of the victim
> > > >   * @gfp_mask: reclaim mode
> > >
> > > This patch conflicts with the folio work, so I'm just rebasing the
> > > folio patches on top of this, and I think this part of the patch is a
> > > mistake.  We don't want to document the __mem_cgroup_charge() function.
> > > That's an implementation detail.  This patch should instead have moved the
> > > kernel-doc to memcontrol.h and continued to document mem_cgroup_charge().
> >
> > Ack.
> > There was a v4 version of this patch:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1458907 which was picked up by
> > Andrew already. If others agree that documentation should be moved
> > into the header file then I'll gladly post another version. Or I can
> > post a separate patch moving the documentation only. Whatever works
> > best. Andrew, Michal, Johannes, WDYT?
>
> At this point, I've moved the documentation as part of the folio patch.
> I'd rather not redo that patch again ...

Ok. If you need me to redo anything please let me know.