[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210719144949.841363419@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:51:24 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 195/315] wireless: wext-spy: Fix out-of-bounds warning
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
[ Upstream commit e93bdd78406da9ed01554c51e38b2a02c8ef8025 ]
Fix the following out-of-bounds warning:
net/wireless/wext-spy.c:178:2: warning: 'memcpy' offset [25, 28] from the object at 'threshold' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'low' with type 'struct iw_quality' at offset 20 [-Warray-bounds]
The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a
couple of struct members adjacent to each other in a single call to
memcpy(). This causes a legitimate compiler warning because memcpy()
overruns the length of &threshold.low and &spydata->spy_thr_low. As
these are just a couple of struct members, fix this by using direct
assignments, instead of memcpy().
This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds
and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines
on memcpy().
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210422200032.GA168995@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/wireless/wext-spy.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/wireless/wext-spy.c b/net/wireless/wext-spy.c
index 33bef22e44e9..b379a0371653 100644
--- a/net/wireless/wext-spy.c
+++ b/net/wireless/wext-spy.c
@@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ int iw_handler_set_thrspy(struct net_device * dev,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
/* Just do it */
- memcpy(&(spydata->spy_thr_low), &(threshold->low),
- 2 * sizeof(struct iw_quality));
+ spydata->spy_thr_low = threshold->low;
+ spydata->spy_thr_high = threshold->high;
/* Clear flag */
memset(spydata->spy_thr_under, '\0', sizeof(spydata->spy_thr_under));
@@ -147,8 +147,8 @@ int iw_handler_get_thrspy(struct net_device * dev,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
/* Just do it */
- memcpy(&(threshold->low), &(spydata->spy_thr_low),
- 2 * sizeof(struct iw_quality));
+ threshold->low = spydata->spy_thr_low;
+ threshold->high = spydata->spy_thr_high;
return 0;
}
@@ -173,10 +173,10 @@ static void iw_send_thrspy_event(struct net_device * dev,
memcpy(threshold.addr.sa_data, address, ETH_ALEN);
threshold.addr.sa_family = ARPHRD_ETHER;
/* Copy stats */
- memcpy(&(threshold.qual), wstats, sizeof(struct iw_quality));
+ threshold.qual = *wstats;
/* Copy also thresholds */
- memcpy(&(threshold.low), &(spydata->spy_thr_low),
- 2 * sizeof(struct iw_quality));
+ threshold.low = spydata->spy_thr_low;
+ threshold.high = spydata->spy_thr_high;
/* Send event to user space */
wireless_send_event(dev, SIOCGIWTHRSPY, &wrqu, (char *) &threshold);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists