linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 012/421] ntfs: fix validity check for file name attribute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210719144946.719267337@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:47:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com>,
        syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 012/421] ntfs: fix validity check for file name attribute

From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com>

commit d98e4d95411bbde2220a7afa38dcc9c14d71acbe upstream.

When checking the file name attribute, we want to ensure that it fits
within the bounds of ATTR_RECORD.  To do this, we should check that (attr
record + file name offset + file name length) < (attr record + attr record
length).

However, the original check did not include the file name offset in the
calculation.  This means that corrupted on-disk metadata might not caught
by the incorrect file name check, and lead to an invalid memory access.

An example can be seen in the crash report of a memory corruption error
found by Syzbot:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a1a1e379b225812688566745c3e2f7242bffc246

Adding the file name offset to the validity check fixes this error and
passes the Syzbot reproducer test.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210614050540.289494-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@...il.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+213ac8bb98f7f4420840@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Acked-by: Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/ntfs/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/ntfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs/inode.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ err_corrupt_attr:
 		}
 		file_name_attr = (FILE_NAME_ATTR*)((u8*)attr +
 				le16_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_offset));
-		p2 = (u8*)attr + le32_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_length);
+		p2 = (u8 *)file_name_attr + le32_to_cpu(attr->data.resident.value_length);
 		if (p2 < (u8*)attr || p2 > p)
 			goto err_corrupt_attr;
 		/* This attribute is ok, but is it in the $Extend directory? */