lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210719144948.342625703@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:47:53 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 062/421] sched/fair: Fix ascii art by relpacing tabs

From: Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>

[ Upstream commit 08f7c2f4d0e9f4283f5796b8168044c034a1bfcb ]

When using something other than 8 spaces per tab, this ascii art
makes not sense, and the reader might end up wondering what this
advanced equation "is".

Signed-off-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210518125202.78658-4-odin@uged.al
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index acb34e9df551..9cdbc07bb70f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2940,7 +2940,7 @@ void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
  *
  *                     tg->weight * grq->load.weight
  *   ge->load.weight = -----------------------------               (1)
- *			  \Sum grq->load.weight
+ *                       \Sum grq->load.weight
  *
  * Now, because computing that sum is prohibitively expensive to compute (been
  * there, done that) we approximate it with this average stuff. The average
@@ -2954,7 +2954,7 @@ void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
  *
  *                     tg->weight * grq->avg.load_avg
  *   ge->load.weight = ------------------------------              (3)
- *				tg->load_avg
+ *                             tg->load_avg
  *
  * Where: tg->load_avg ~= \Sum grq->avg.load_avg
  *
@@ -2970,7 +2970,7 @@ void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
  *
  *                     tg->weight * grq->load.weight
  *   ge->load.weight = ----------------------------- = tg->weight   (4)
- *			    grp->load.weight
+ *                         grp->load.weight
  *
  * That is, the sum collapses because all other CPUs are idle; the UP scenario.
  *
@@ -2989,7 +2989,7 @@ void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
  *
  *                     tg->weight * grq->load.weight
  *   ge->load.weight = -----------------------------		   (6)
- *				tg_load_avg'
+ *                             tg_load_avg'
  *
  * Where:
  *
-- 
2.30.2



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ