linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Jul 2021 11:16:24 -0400
From:   Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, jianyong.wu@....com,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime headers

On Thursday, July 15, 2021 2:57:55 PM EDT Arnd Bergmann wrote: 
> This looks reasonable overall. I'm not sure if Thomas has other plans for
> this header, as he created the timekeeping.h one originally. There is also
> the potential for build regressions when additional files depend on
> timekeeping.h but don't include it directly. Hopefully the kbuild bot will
> warn us about any of those.
> 
>        Arnd

Your intuition was right Arnd. Playing with heavier configurations I have found 
three more files that also needed an update on the header. I am going to send 
the patch again (v2) including those. Please let me know if I should add your 
Reviewed-by or if you want me to do any further checking.

Thanks!

Carlos.